Use cases
Who this is for
The product suits some situations well and others badly. Here is our honest read.
-
Independent businesses with no time to write
You know your subject but publishing consistently keeps slipping. Set a cadence you can live with and review each article before it goes live.
-
Agencies managing several client sites
Separate sites, separate settings, separate budgets, one dashboard. Every article is reviewable before publication.
-
Established sites filling genuine gaps
We read your existing content and avoid topics that would compete with pages you already rank for.
-
New sites building a foundation
Start from a niche and audience you describe, with topic clusters rather than scattered one-off posts.
Where this is the wrong tool
What we would not recommend it for
- Medical, legal or financial advice High-stakes content needs qualified human review. The product can draft, but you must have a review process — and we will not pretend otherwise.
- Content built on first-hand testing If an article needs someone to have actually used a product, we cannot write it. We will not manufacture experience we do not have.
- Publishing at volume to game rankings Scaled content made primarily to manipulate search results is against search guidance and against how this product is built. The daily limit is a ceiling, not a target.
- Replacing a writer who knows the subject If you have someone writing well already, this will not beat them. It is for when the alternative is publishing nothing.